Clawson vs Warren

Which is the better fit for you?

Clawson, MI
67
Area Score
Top 21% nationally
Warren, MI
52
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Clawson receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Clawson to Warren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$28 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,439 in Warren against $1,410 in Clawson.
The median home
28% less
$193,400 in Warren against $267,100 in Clawson.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 20°F in Warren against 20°F in Clawson; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Clawson
Warren
Opportunity: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
51 · Bottom 39%
vs
29 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
52 · Top 47%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate
63 · Bottom 28%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
83 · Top 8%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access
89 · Bottom 37%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%

Measured values

MetricClawsonWarrenSource period
Population11,374137,9282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$88,636 — more favorable$64,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,141 — more favorable$33,0152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,170/sq mi4,012/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$267,100$193,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,253 ±$126$1,225 ±$272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,410 — more favorable$1,439FY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate75.4%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable7.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5% — more favorable−0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher45.8% — more favorable21.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.9% — more favorable14.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1810112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.6 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+63.6%+274.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.9"29.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport25 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.4 min — more favorable26.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.438.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3402024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.6 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency37.0% — more favorable25.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.6% — more favorable36.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility31.4%74.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Clawson
—
Clawson: Your Score
67
Area Score
Warren
—
Warren: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Clawson, MI · Warren, MI · How this is calculated: methodology