Clawson vs Sterling Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

Clawson, MI
67
Area Score
Top 21% nationally
Sterling Heights, MI
61
Area Score
Top 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Clawson receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Clawson to Sterling Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$15 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,395 in Sterling Heights against $1,410 in Clawson.
The median home
3% more
$274,300 in Sterling Heights against $267,100 in Clawson.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 18°F in Sterling Heights against 20°F in Clawson; July highs are 82°F against 84°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Clawson
Sterling Heights
Opportunity: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
51 · Bottom 39%
vs
38 · Bottom 14%
Growth: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
52 · Top 47%
vs
63 · Top 24%
Climate: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 28%
vs
62 · Bottom 19%
Physical resilience: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
83 · Top 8%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Access
89 · Bottom 37%
vs
85 · Bottom 28%
Economic stability: Clawson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
54 · Bottom 44%

Measured values

MetricClawsonSterling HeightsSource period
Population11,374133,5732024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$88,636 — more favorable$79,9092024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,141 — more favorable$38,0842024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,170/sq mi3,665/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$267,100$274,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,253 ±$126$1,292 ±$512024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,410$1,395 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate75.4%75.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable6.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5% — more favorable−0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher45.8% — more favorable31.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.9% — more favorable11.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1872812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.65.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+63.6%+89.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.9"35.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport25 mi — more favorable30 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.4 min — more favorable26.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.441.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3352024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.6 — more favorable16.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency37.0%43.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.6%53.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility31.4%62.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Clawson
—
Clawson: Your Score
67
Area Score
Sterling Heights
—
Sterling Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Clawson, MI · Sterling Heights, MI · How this is calculated: methodology