Cicero vs Lansing

Which is the better fit for you?

Cicero, IL
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally
Lansing, IL
47
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Cicero and Lansing receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cicero to Lansing

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$20 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,470 in Lansing against $1,490 in Cicero.
The median home
29% less
$177,000 in Lansing against $249,400 in Cicero.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Lansing against 19°F in Cicero; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cicero
Lansing
Opportunity: Cicero is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
32 · Bottom 8%
vs
30 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
12 · Bottom 2%
vs
13 · Bottom 2%
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
69 · Top 38%
Housing affordability: Cicero is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 24%
vs
70 · Top 39%
Schools: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
16 · Bottom 8%
vs
24 · Bottom 17%
Access: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 36%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
43 · Bottom 26%
vs
49 · Bottom 34%

Measured values

MetricCiceroLansingSource period
Population82,79728,2842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$70,842 ±$3,824$75,569 ±$6,9952024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$25,547$36,031 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density14,117/sq mi3,790/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$249,400$177,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,154 — more favorable$1,2682024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,490$1,470 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate54.6%71.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6% — more favorable6.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.2%−3.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher10.8%28.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.7% ±2%14.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.4%−42.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"34.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute32.0 min — more favorable35.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.441.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1882024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.5 — more favorable16.12024-25 school year
Math proficiency13.3%17.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency18.0%27.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility82.0%78.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cicero

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Lansing

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cicero
—
Cicero: Your Score
47
Area Score
Lansing
—
Lansing: Your Score
47
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cicero, IL · Lansing, IL · How this is calculated: methodology