Chippewa Falls vs Oshkosh

Which is the better fit for you?

Chippewa Falls, WI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally
Oshkosh, WI
63
Area Score
Top 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chippewa Falls receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chippewa Falls to Oshkosh

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% lower
Regional price level 90.8 against 91.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$32 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,149 in Oshkosh against $1,181 in Chippewa Falls.
The median home
16% less
$177,700 in Oshkosh against $210,400 in Chippewa Falls.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F milder
Normal January lows are 11°F in Oshkosh against 6°F in Chippewa Falls; July highs are 81°F against 83°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Chippewa Falls
Oshkosh
Opportunity: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
62 · Top 37%
Growth: Oshkosh is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 35%
vs
49 · Bottom 47%
Climate: Oshkosh is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
57 · Bottom 8%
Physical resilience: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 21%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
80 · Top 12%
Schools: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
41 · Bottom 39%
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 35%
vs
43 · Bottom 26%

Measured values

MetricChippewa FallsOshkoshSource period
Population14,78266,7292024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,873 ±$6,743$62,188 ±$2,7502024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,256 ±$2,301$33,003 ±$1,1272024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,300/sq mi2,423/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$210,400$177,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$910 ±$51$935 ±$232024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,181$1,149 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index91.590.8 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate50.7%55.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.9% — more favorable+0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.9%27.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.4% ±5%14.1% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5419612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.7 — more favorable2.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−61.4%−26.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low6°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.0"30.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.8 min ±2.2 min19.3 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.234.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.012.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.8% — more favorable40.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.4% — more favorable34.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chippewa Falls
—
Chippewa Falls: Your Score
65
Area Score
Oshkosh
—
Oshkosh: Your Score
63
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chippewa Falls, WI · Oshkosh, WI · How this is calculated: methodology