Chippewa Falls vs Eau Claire

Which is the better fit for you?

Chippewa Falls, WI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally
Eau Claire, WI
70
Area Score
Top 14% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Eau Claire receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chippewa Falls to Eau Claire

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 91.5 against 91.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,181 in Eau Claire against $1,181 in Chippewa Falls.
The median home
18% more
$247,600 in Eau Claire against $210,400 in Chippewa Falls.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 6°F in Eau Claire against 6°F in Chippewa Falls; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chippewa Falls
Eau Claire
Opportunity: Eau Claire is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
74 · Top 18%
Growth: Eau Claire is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 35%
vs
55 · Top 39%
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
53 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 21%
vs
79 · Top 26%
Housing affordability: Eau Claire is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
84 · Top 7%
Schools: Eau Claire is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
60 · Top 37%
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Eau Claire is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 35%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricChippewa FallsEau ClaireSource period
Population14,78270,3222024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$57,873$67,395 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$31,256$39,434 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,300/sq mi2,048/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$210,400$247,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$910 — more favorable$1,0452024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,181$1,181FY2026
Cost of living index91.591.52023
Homeownership rate50.7%54.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2%3.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.9% — more favorable+0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.9%36.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.4% ±5%10.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5445612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.76.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−61.4%−35.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low6°F6°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.0"33.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.8 min ±2.2 min18.0 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.232.92024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.013.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.8%46.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.4%42.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chippewa Falls

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Eau Claire

Elevated or high exposure: hail, strong wind, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chippewa Falls
—
Chippewa Falls: Your Score
65
Area Score
Eau Claire
—
Eau Claire: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chippewa Falls, WI · Eau Claire, WI · How this is calculated: methodology