Chino Hills vs Rancho Cucamonga

Which is the better fit for you?

Chino Hills, CA
50
Area Score
Bottom 21% nationally
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rancho Cucamonga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chino Hills to Rancho Cucamonga

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 107.3 against 107.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$1,099 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,201 in Rancho Cucamonga against $3,300 in Chino Hills.
The median home
15% less
$740,200 in Rancho Cucamonga against $874,900 in Chino Hills.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Rancho Cucamonga against 42°F in Chino Hills; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chino Hills
Rancho Cucamonga
Opportunity: Chino Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 44%
vs
56 · Top 49%
Growth: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
30 · Bottom 15%
vs
32 · Bottom 17%
Climate
89 · Top 5%
vs
89 · Top 5%
Physical resilience
7 · Bottom 3%
vs
7 · Bottom 2%
Housing affordability: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
36 · Bottom 7%
vs
40 · Bottom 10%
Schools: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
64 · Top 31%
vs
65 · Top 30%
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 1%
Economic stability: Chino Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
61 · Top 43%

Measured values

MetricChino HillsRancho CucamongaSource period
Population77,927175,4112024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$126,334 — more favorable$111,8952024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$50,555 — more favorable$47,4752024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,745/sq mi3,771/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$874,900$740,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,894$2,357 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,300$2,201 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index107.3107.32023
Homeownership rate69.2%62.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.1% — more favorable37.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.2% ±2%7.8% ±0.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2929212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.41.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−76.8%−64.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low42°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation10.0"11.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi6 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute38.7 min34.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.538.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools16362024-25 school year
Students per teacher25.624.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.3% — more favorable54.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.6%70.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility53.7%47.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise. This is common on these pages by construction: Chino Hills and Rancho Cucamonga were paired because they are alike, and the more alike two places are, the less a sample of this size can tell them apart.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chino Hills

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Rancho Cucamonga

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chino Hills
—
Chino Hills: Your Score
50
Area Score
Rancho Cucamonga
—
Rancho Cucamonga: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chino Hills, CA · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · How this is calculated: methodology