Chino vs Pasadena

Which is the better fit for you?

Chino, CA
48
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Pasadena, CA
48
Area Score
Bottom 15% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chino and Pasadena receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chino to Pasadena

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
7% higher
Regional price level 114.7 against 107.3 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$497 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $3,088 in Pasadena against $2,590 in Chino.
The median home
60% more
$1,093,300 in Pasadena against $683,400 in Chino.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F milder
Normal January lows are 49°F in Pasadena against 42°F in Chino; July highs are 82°F against 94°F (summers 12°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Chino
Pasadena
Opportunity: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
52 · Bottom 41%
Growth: Chino is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
60 · Top 29%
vs
59 · Top 31%
Climate: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
89 · Top 5%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Physical resilience: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
7 · Bottom 2%
vs
11 · Bottom 4%
Housing affordability: Chino is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
36 · Bottom 7%
vs
35 · Bottom 6%
Schools: Chino is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
32 · Bottom 28%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Chino is the more favorable of the two.
Access
100 · Top 1%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability: Chino is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 49%
vs
52 · Bottom 39%

Measured values

MetricChinoPasadenaSource period
Population92,652136,9692024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$104,682 ±$4,849$105,192 ±$3,4442024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$37,217$65,304 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,133/sq mi5,966/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$683,400$1,093,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,336 ±$90$2,265 ±$382024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,590 — more favorable$3,088FY2026
Cost of living index107.3 — more favorable114.72023
Homeownership rate64.0%42.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%4.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher27.2%56.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate7.8% — more favorable13.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)27440412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.0 — more favorable2.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−12.5%+176.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low42°F49°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation10.0"14.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable20 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.9 min29.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.240.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools17232024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.8 — more favorable22.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.3% — more favorable32.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.9% — more favorable46.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility71.7%69.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chino

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding, earthquake.

Pasadena

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chino
—
Chino: Your Score
48
Area Score
Pasadena
—
Pasadena: Your Score
48
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chino, CA · Pasadena, CA · How this is calculated: methodology