Chicago vs St. John

Which is the better fit for you?

Chicago, IL
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
St. John, IN
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. John receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chicago to St. John

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$327 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,214 in St. John against $1,541 in Chicago.
The median home
22% more
$406,300 in St. John against $334,100 in Chicago.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 18°F in St. John against 19°F in Chicago; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chicago
St. John
Opportunity: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 12%
vs
69 · Top 25%
Growth: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
22 · Bottom 7%
vs
83 · Top 3%
Climate: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
62 · Bottom 21%
Physical resilience: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
81 · Top 22%
Housing affordability: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 29%
vs
86 · Top 5%
Schools: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 36%
vs
63 · Top 33%
Access: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
97 · Top 32%
Economic stability: St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
45 · Bottom 29%
vs
79 · Top 5%

Measured values

MetricChicagoSt. JohnSource period
Population2,711,22622,5672024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$77,902$131,467 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$50,086$54,962 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density11,904/sq mi1,771/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$334,100$406,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,440$989 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,541$1,214 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate46.0%97.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.5%4.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%+0.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate44.3% ±0.4%43.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate16.1%2.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,53130112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.913.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−52.1%+15.3% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"33.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate35.9 min ±0.2 min34.5 min ±1.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.842.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools65732024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable18.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency26.2%47.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency28.6%71.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility73.4%21.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Illinois and Indiana do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chicago

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

St. John

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chicago
—
Chicago: Your Score
52
Area Score
St. John
—
St. John: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chicago, IL · St. John, IN · How this is calculated: methodology