Chicago vs Lake Forest

Which is the better fit for you?

Chicago, IL
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
Lake Forest, IL
72
Area Score
Top 10% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake Forest receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chicago to Lake Forest

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$1,119 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,660 in Lake Forest against $1,541 in Chicago.
The median home
181% more
$938,300 in Lake Forest against $334,100 in Chicago.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 18°F in Lake Forest against 19°F in Chicago; July highs are 84°F against 85°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chicago
Lake Forest
Opportunity: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 12%
vs
81 · Top 7%
Growth: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
22 · Bottom 7%
vs
35 · Bottom 21%
Climate: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
62 · Bottom 21%
Physical resilience: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
80 · Top 23%
Housing affordability: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 29%
vs
60 · Bottom 35%
Schools: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 36%
vs
98 · Top 1%
Access: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability: Lake Forest is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
45 · Bottom 29%
vs
66 · Top 34%

Measured values

MetricChicagoLake ForestSource period
Population2,711,22619,4162024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$77,902$235,081 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$50,086$109,918 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density11,904/sq mi1,129/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$334,100$938,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,440 — more favorable$1,8152024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,541 — more favorable$2,660FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate46.0%88.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.5%3.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%+0.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher44.3%80.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate16.1%3.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,5311612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.9 — more favorable0.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−52.1%−20.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"32.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi — more favorable18 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate35.9 min ±0.2 min33.5 min ±4.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.846.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools65772024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.610.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency26.2%70.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency28.6%71.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chicago

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Lake Forest

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chicago
—
Chicago: Your Score
52
Area Score
Lake Forest
—
Lake Forest: Your Score
72
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chicago, IL · Lake Forest, IL · How this is calculated: methodology