Chicago vs Hickory Hills

Which is the better fit for you?

Chicago, IL
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
Hickory Hills, IL
58
Area Score
Bottom 48% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hickory Hills receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chicago to Hickory Hills

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$181 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,360 in Hickory Hills against $1,541 in Chicago.
The median home
14% less
$288,000 in Hickory Hills against $334,100 in Chicago.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Hickory Hills against 19°F in Chicago; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chicago
Hickory Hills
Opportunity: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 12%
vs
33 · Bottom 9%
Growth: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
22 · Bottom 7%
vs
20 · Bottom 5%
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
69 · Top 38%
Housing affordability: Hickory Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 29%
vs
76 · Top 22%
Schools: Hickory Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 36%
vs
89 · Top 4%
Access: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
92 · Bottom 48%
Economic stability: Hickory Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
45 · Bottom 29%
vs
59 · Top 49%

Measured values

MetricChicagoHickory HillsSource period
Population2,711,22614,5262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$77,902 ±$907$77,262 ±$14,5992024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$50,086 — more favorable$37,2162024 ACS 5-Year
Population density11,904/sq mi5,108/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$334,100$288,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,440$1,145 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,541$1,360 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate46.0%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.5%5.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher44.3% — more favorable24.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate16.1% ±0.4%10.8% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,531612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.9 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−52.1%−45.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"34.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi — more favorable18 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.9 min31.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.838.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools65732024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable14.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency26.2%60.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency28.6%65.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility73.4%61.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chicago

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Hickory Hills

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chicago
—
Chicago: Your Score
52
Area Score
Hickory Hills
—
Hickory Hills: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chicago, IL · Hickory Hills, IL · How this is calculated: methodology