Cheektowaga vs Lackawanna

Which is the better fit for you?

Cheektowaga, NY
62
Area Score
Top 38% nationally
Lackawanna, NY
58
Area Score
Bottom 49% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Cheektowaga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cheektowaga to Lackawanna

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.9 against 94.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$242 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,160 in Lackawanna against $1,402 in Cheektowaga.
The median home
24% less
$140,700 in Lackawanna against $185,500 in Cheektowaga.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Lackawanna against 19°F in Cheektowaga; July highs are 80°F against 80°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cheektowaga
Lackawanna
Opportunity: Cheektowaga is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
58 · Top 47%
vs
49 · Bottom 35%
Growth: Cheektowaga is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 36%
vs
30 · Bottom 15%
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
62 · Bottom 23%
Physical resilience
80 · Top 25%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Cheektowaga is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 24%
vs
71 · Top 37%
Schools: Lackawanna is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 35%
vs
53 · Top 45%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Cheektowaga is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
64 · Top 37%
vs
24 · Bottom 5%

Measured values

MetricCheektowagaLackawannaSource period
Population76,05619,7532024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$68,613 — more favorable$52,1102024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,961 — more favorable$26,6112024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,997/sq mi3,017/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$185,500$140,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,055$872 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,402$1,160 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.994.92023
Homeownership rate71.1%56.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%4.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8%+0.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher29.6% — more favorable20.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate10.1% — more favorable22.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,183012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.2 — more favorable0.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+17.6%+17.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high80°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.7"40.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport2 mi — more favorable10 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.6 min ±1.0 min21.4 min ±1.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.437.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1252024-25 school year
Students per teacher10.910.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.9%62.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.1%62.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility62.6%81.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cheektowaga

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Lackawanna

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cheektowaga
—
Cheektowaga: Your Score
62
Area Score
Lackawanna
—
Lackawanna: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cheektowaga, NY · Lackawanna, NY · How this is calculated: methodology