Chaska vs Victoria

Which is the better fit for you?

Chaska, MN
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally
Victoria, MN
73
Area Score
Top 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Victoria receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chaska to Victoria

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 104.3 against 104.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in Victoria against $1,709 in Chaska.
The median home
44% more
$581,200 in Victoria against $404,700 in Chaska.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 8°F in Victoria against 8°F in Chaska; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chaska
Victoria
Opportunity: Chaska is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 32%
vs
64 · Top 33%
Growth: Victoria is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 46%
vs
52 · Top 45%
Climate
54 · Bottom 4%
vs
54 · Bottom 4%
Physical resilience
90 · Top 11%
vs
90 · Top 11%
Housing affordability: Victoria is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 11%
vs
93 · Top 1%
Schools: Victoria is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
61 · Top 35%
vs
73 · Top 21%
Access: Chaska is the more favorable of the two.
Access
88 · Bottom 36%
vs
87 · Bottom 33%
Economic stability: Victoria is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
80 · Top 4%
vs
87 · Top 1%

Measured values

MetricChaskaVictoriaSource period
Population28,70611,2952024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$110,956$195,639 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$56,397$76,567 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,675/sq mi1,242/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$404,700$581,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,553 ±$110$2,235 ±$7812024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,709$1,709FY2026
Cost of living index104.3104.32023
Homeownership rate67.6%93.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%4.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.6%66.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.1%2.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)817212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.86.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.6%−58.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low8°F8°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation30.6"30.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport20 mi — more favorable21 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.9 min — more favorable32.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.541.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools2212024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.415.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency57.9%63.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency66.6%68.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility21.1%6.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chaska

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail, tornado.

Victoria

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chaska
—
Chaska: Your Score
69
Area Score
Victoria
—
Victoria: Your Score
73
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chaska, MN · Victoria, MN · How this is calculated: methodology