Channahon vs Chicago

Which is the better fit for you?

Channahon, IL
64
Area Score
Top 33% nationally
Chicago, IL
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Channahon receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Channahon to Chicago

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$555 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,541 in Chicago against $2,097 in Channahon.
The median home
2% more
$334,100 in Chicago against $327,900 in Channahon.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 19°F in Chicago against 15°F in Channahon; July highs are 85°F against 84°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Channahon
Chicago
Opportunity: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
43 · Bottom 22%
vs
37 · Bottom 12%
Growth: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
57 · Top 36%
vs
22 · Bottom 7%
Climate: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
80 · Top 24%
vs
69 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 3%
vs
74 · Top 29%
Schools: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
57 · Top 40%
vs
39 · Bottom 36%
Access: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Access
78 · Bottom 18%
vs
94 · Top 45%
Economic stability: Channahon is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
75 · Top 13%
vs
45 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricChannahonChicagoSource period
Population13,9272,711,2262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$119,494 — more favorable$77,9022024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$47,476 ±$4,675$50,086 ±$5812024 ACS 5-Year
Population density841/sq mi11,904/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$327,900$334,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,708$1,440 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,097$1,541 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate90.1%46.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.9% — more favorable5.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.2%−3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher28.3%44.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.6% — more favorable16.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)532,53112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.8 — more favorable0.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.2%−52.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.8"34.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport42 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute32.8 min — more favorable35.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.235.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools96572024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.113.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency37.8% — more favorable26.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency44.5% — more favorable28.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Channahon

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Chicago

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Channahon
—
Channahon: Your Score
64
Area Score
Chicago
—
Chicago: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Channahon, IL · Chicago, IL · How this is calculated: methodology