Chalco vs Omaha

Which is the better fit for you?

Chalco, NE
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Omaha, NE
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chalco receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chalco to Omaha

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 92.5 against 92.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$76 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,396 in Omaha against $1,320 in Chalco.
The median home
3% more
$245,500 in Omaha against $238,600 in Chalco.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 15°F in Omaha against 15°F in Chalco; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chalco
Omaha
Opportunity: Chalco is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
85 · Top 2%
vs
78 · Top 10%
Growth: Chalco is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
83 · Top 3%
vs
61 · Top 28%
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
59 · Bottom 12%
Physical resilience: Chalco is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
75 · Top 31%
vs
62 · Top 46%
Housing affordability: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 39%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Schools: Chalco is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
76 · Top 17%
vs
45 · Bottom 44%
Access: Omaha is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Chalco is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
90 · Top 1%
vs
56 · Bottom 47%

Measured values

MetricChalcoOmahaSource period
Population10,595488,8372024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$85,672 — more favorable$73,2012024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$42,617 ±$2,936$43,638 ±$7672024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,942/sq mi3,420/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$238,600$245,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,195 ±$79$1,187 ±$132024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,320 — more favorable$1,396FY2026
Cost of living index92.592.52023
Homeownership rate68.5%57.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.7% — more favorable3.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.7% — more favorable+0.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate37.0% ±4%40.1% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.7% — more favorable12.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,1883,48712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents11.1 — more favorable7.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+16.8% — more favorable−11.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate20.9 min ±1.3 min21.0 min ±0.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.435.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools11862024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.1 — more favorable16.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency56.2% — more favorable48.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency56.1% — more favorable50.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility21.2%25.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chalco

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, hail, heat wave.

Omaha

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado, heat wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chalco
—
Chalco: Your Score
77
Area Score
Omaha
—
Omaha: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chalco, NE · Omaha, NE · How this is calculated: methodology