Cedar Lake vs Easthampton

Which is the better fit for you?

Cedar Lake, IN
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Easthampton, MA
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Cedar Lake receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cedar Lake to Easthampton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.8 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
32% more
$371,500 in Easthampton against $282,000 in Cedar Lake.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Easthampton against 18°F in Cedar Lake; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Cedar Lake
Easthampton
Opportunity: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
62 · Top 38%
vs
57 · Top 48%
Growth: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 25%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 21%
vs
60 · Bottom 13%
Physical resilience: Easthampton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 22%
vs
82 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 41%
Schools: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
65 · Top 30%
vs
61 · Top 35%
Access: Easthampton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 42%
vs
100 · Top 3%
Economic stability: Cedar Lake is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
67 · Top 30%
vs
62 · Top 42%

Measured values

MetricCedar LakeEasthamptonSource period
Population15,29516,0862024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$83,381 ±$13,325$71,673 ±$6,5742024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,962 ±$3,808$45,977 ±$3,8132024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,618/sq mi1,207/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$282,000$371,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,350 ±$342$1,292 ±$702024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index102.5 — more favorable102.82023
Homeownership rate85.2%58.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.4% — more favorable−0.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher27.4%38.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.4% — more favorable8.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)816812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.3 — more favorable4.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−45.3%+36.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"45.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.3 min24.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.246.02024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher17.410.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.8%49.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency61.8%56.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Indiana and Massachusetts do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cedar Lake

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Easthampton

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cedar Lake
—
Cedar Lake: Your Score
69
Area Score
Easthampton
—
Easthampton: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cedar Lake, IN · Easthampton, MA · How this is calculated: methodology