Casas Adobes vs Flowing Wells

Which is the better fit for you?

Casas Adobes, AZ
50
Area Score
Bottom 20% nationally
Flowing Wells, AZ
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Casas Adobes receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Casas Adobes to Flowing Wells

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.9 against 94.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$501 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,229 in Flowing Wells against $1,730 in Casas Adobes.
The median home
88% less
$41,100 in Flowing Wells against $343,400 in Casas Adobes.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 41°F in Flowing Wells against 41°F in Casas Adobes; July highs are 99°F against 99°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Casas Adobes
Flowing Wells
Opportunity: Casas Adobes is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
31 · Bottom 7%
vs
11 · Bottom 1%
Growth
51 · Top 49%
vs
51 · Top 49%
Climate
64 · Bottom 33%
vs
64 · Bottom 33%
Physical resilience
19 · Bottom 13%
vs
19 · Bottom 13%
Housing affordability: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 43%
vs
70 · Top 39%
Schools: Casas Adobes is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
71 · Top 23%
vs
50 · Top 49%
Access: Flowing Wells is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 43%
vs
96 · Top 33%
Economic stability: Casas Adobes is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 34%
vs
31 · Bottom 11%

Measured values

MetricCasas AdobesFlowing WellsSource period
Population72,05916,5592024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$83,683 — more favorable$39,7742024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$47,276 — more favorable$23,5532024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,717/sq mi4,347/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$343,400$41,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,650$1,034 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,730$1,229 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.994.92023
Homeownership rate67.5%69.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.6%5.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.5%−4.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher42.5% — more favorable13.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.1% — more favorable23.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4,7904,79012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.54.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+5.2%+5.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high99°F99°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.1"11.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi13 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.9 min24.3 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.037.92024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher17.016.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.0% — more favorable45.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency56.2% — more favorable46.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Casas Adobes

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Flowing Wells

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Casas Adobes
—
Casas Adobes: Your Score
50
Area Score
Flowing Wells
—
Flowing Wells: Your Score
43
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Casas Adobes, AZ · Flowing Wells, AZ · How this is calculated: methodology