Carthage vs Neosho

Which is the better fit for you?

Carthage, MO
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
Neosho, MO
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Neosho receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Carthage to Neosho

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 85.2 against 85.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $947 in Neosho against $947 in Carthage.
The median home
11% more
$163,400 in Neosho against $146,800 in Carthage.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 25°F in Neosho against 25°F in Carthage; July highs are 90°F against 90°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Carthage
Neosho
Opportunity: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 31%
vs
67 · Top 28%
Growth: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
49 · Bottom 48%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate
71 · Top 45%
vs
71 · Top 45%
Physical resilience: Carthage is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 43%
vs
35 · Bottom 28%
Housing affordability: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
62 · Bottom 39%
vs
85 · Top 6%
Schools: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
43 · Bottom 41%
Access: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Access
68 · Bottom 10%
vs
78 · Bottom 19%
Economic stability: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
30 · Bottom 9%
vs
38 · Bottom 18%

Measured values

MetricCarthageNeoshoSource period
Population15,57413,2242024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$51,328 ±$4,694$57,891 ±$5,1042024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$25,235 ±$4,276$26,440 ±$2,4072024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,287/sq mi848/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$146,800$163,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$975$745 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$947$947FY2026
Cost of living index85.285.22023
Homeownership rate53.0%61.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.3%+2.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate22.1% ±4%21.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate27.9%14.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)608912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.96.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−27.7%−1.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.6"45.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport52 mi39 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute17.0 min — more favorable21.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.233.02024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.4 — more favorable15.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.3%42.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency48.6%50.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Carthage

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, tornado, drought.

Neosho

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, inland flooding, cold wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Carthage
—
Carthage: Your Score
56
Area Score
Neosho
—
Neosho: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Carthage, MO · Neosho, MO · How this is calculated: methodology