Calverton vs Swampscott

Which is the better fit for you?

Calverton, MD
66
Area Score
Top 27% nationally
Swampscott, MA
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Calverton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Calverton to Swampscott

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 110.4 against 109.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
62% more
$771,100 in Swampscott against $477,100 in Calverton.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F colder
Normal January lows are 20°F in Swampscott against 30°F in Calverton; July highs are 82°F against 90°F (summers 8°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

37 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Calverton
Swampscott
Opportunity: Swampscott is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
55 · Bottom 47%
vs
56 · Bottom 49%
Growth: Calverton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
51 · Top 48%
vs
47 · Bottom 44%
Climate: Calverton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 42%
vs
63 · Bottom 27%
Physical resilience: Calverton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 21%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability: Calverton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
52 · Bottom 24%
vs
50 · Bottom 21%
Schools: Swampscott is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
75 · Top 18%
vs
79 · Top 13%
Access: Swampscott is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Swampscott is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 41%
vs
70 · Top 25%

Measured values

MetricCalvertonSwampscottSource period
Population17,62415,2772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$107,381$134,386 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$48,331$78,590 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,851/sq mi5,055/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$477,100$771,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$2,164 ±$316$2,303 ±$1432024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index109.5 — more favorable110.42023
Homeownership rate69.2%75.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7% — more favorable4.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.7%−1.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher43.5%62.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.1% ±4%6.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,6011,21712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.4 — more favorable1.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+129.6% — more favorable+13.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation41.8"44.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.1 min — more favorable38.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.444.52024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.311.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.7%65.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.4%62.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Maryland and Massachusetts do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Calverton

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Swampscott

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake, hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Calverton
—
Calverton: Your Score
66
Area Score
Swampscott
—
Swampscott: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Calverton, MD · Swampscott, MA · How this is calculated: methodology