Burbank vs Chicago

Which is the better fit for you?

Burbank, IL
48
Area Score
Bottom 14% nationally
Chicago, IL
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chicago receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Burbank to Chicago

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$49 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,541 in Chicago against $1,590 in Burbank.
The median home
21% more
$334,100 in Chicago against $275,700 in Burbank.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Chicago against 19°F in Burbank; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Burbank
Chicago
Opportunity: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
30 · Bottom 6%
vs
37 · Bottom 12%
Growth: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
21 · Bottom 6%
vs
22 · Bottom 7%
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
63 · Bottom 26%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
69 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
58 · Bottom 32%
vs
74 · Top 29%
Schools: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
34 · Bottom 30%
vs
39 · Bottom 36%
Access: Chicago is the more favorable of the two.
Access
92 · Bottom 49%
vs
94 · Top 45%
Economic stability: Burbank is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
50 · Bottom 35%
vs
45 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricBurbankChicagoSource period
Population28,7392,711,2262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$80,116 ±$9,695$77,902 ±$9072024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$31,395$50,086 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density6,874/sq mi11,904/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$275,700$334,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,265 — more favorable$1,4402024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,590$1,541 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate80.9%46.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4% — more favorable5.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher15.6%44.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.1% ±3%16.1% ±0.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)62,53112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.20.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−25.0%−52.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"34.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport18 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate34.5 min ±1.5 min35.9 min ±0.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.635.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools106572024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.913.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency23.7%26.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency29.8% — more favorable28.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility65.6%73.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Burbank

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Chicago

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Burbank
—
Burbank: Your Score
48
Area Score
Chicago
—
Chicago: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Burbank, IL · Chicago, IL · How this is calculated: methodology