Brushy Creek vs Fate

Which is the better fit for you?

Brushy Creek, TX
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally
Fate, TX
73
Area Score
Top 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Brushy Creek receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Brushy Creek to Fate

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% higher
Regional price level 102.5 against 98.3 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$322 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,174 in Fate against $1,852 in Brushy Creek.
The median home
23% less
$384,300 in Fate against $499,300 in Brushy Creek.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F colder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Fate against 42°F in Brushy Creek; July highs are 96°F against 97°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Brushy Creek
Fate
Opportunity: Brushy Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
79 · Top 9%
vs
77 · Top 13%
Growth: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
57 · Top 35%
vs
62 · Top 26%
Climate: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
67 · Bottom 39%
vs
68 · Bottom 42%
Physical resilience: Brushy Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
86 · Top 15%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Brushy Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Brushy Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
71 · Top 23%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Access: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 42%
vs
93 · Top 48%
Economic stability: Brushy Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 8%
vs
76 · Top 9%

Measured values

MetricBrushy CreekFateSource period
Population19,57622,8842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$138,589 ±$9,177$132,752 ±$10,2392024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$58,374 — more favorable$41,8042024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,037/sq mi1,880/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$499,300$384,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,127 — more favorable$2,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,852 — more favorable$2,174FY2026
Cost of living index98.3 — more favorable102.52023
Homeownership rate72.7%91.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%4.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.4% — more favorable−0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher57.9% — more favorable42.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.7% ±3%3.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4,33815812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.46.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−34.8%−60.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high97°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low42°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.3"38.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport22 mi20 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute25.9 min — more favorable38.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.531.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.6 — more favorable16.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.0%64.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency58.5% — more favorable48.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Brushy Creek

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Fate

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Brushy Creek
—
Brushy Creek: Your Score
75
Area Score
Fate
—
Fate: Your Score
73
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Brushy Creek, TX · Fate, TX · How this is calculated: methodology