Brown Deer vs Waukesha

Which is the better fit for you?

Brown Deer, WI
59
Area Score
Top 47% nationally
Waukesha, WI
70
Area Score
Top 14% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Waukesha receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Brown Deer to Waukesha

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.7 against 95.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,338 in Waukesha against $1,338 in Brown Deer.
The median home
32% more
$315,500 in Waukesha against $239,300 in Brown Deer.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 17°F in Waukesha against 17°F in Brown Deer; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Brown Deer
Waukesha
Opportunity: Waukesha is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
64 · Top 35%
vs
73 · Top 19%
Growth: Waukesha is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
22 · Bottom 6%
vs
52 · Top 47%
Climate
61 · Bottom 18%
vs
61 · Bottom 18%
Physical resilience: Brown Deer is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
98 · Top 1%
vs
96 · Top 3%
Housing affordability: Brown Deer is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 23%
vs
74 · Top 28%
Schools: Waukesha is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
16 · Bottom 8%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: Waukesha is the more favorable of the two.
Access
65 · Bottom 8%
vs
69 · Bottom 10%
Economic stability: Waukesha is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
68 · Top 29%
vs
71 · Top 21%

Measured values

MetricBrown DeerWaukeshaSource period
Population12,56471,2332024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$93,974 ±$16,025$83,837 ±$3,1792024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$47,108 ±$4,341$44,943 ±$1,5542024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,859/sq mi2,791/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$239,300$315,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,183 ±$76$1,219 ±$412024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,338$1,338FY2026
Cost of living index95.795.72023
Homeownership rate65.2%58.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%3.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable+0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate40.7% ±7%41.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.7% ±2%8.6% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)111412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.11.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−99.4%+72.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F17°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.6"34.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport63 mi56 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.4 min ±1.9 min22.9 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.536.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher15.813.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency27.3%43.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency30.4%41.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Brown Deer
—
Brown Deer: Your Score
59
Area Score
Waukesha
—
Waukesha: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Brown Deer, WI · Waukesha, WI · How this is calculated: methodology