Brawley vs Kerman

Which is the better fit for you?

Brawley, CA
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally
Kerman, CA
44
Area Score
Bottom 7% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Kerman receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Brawley to Kerman

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% higher
Regional price level 104.0 against 100.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$302 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,664 in Kerman against $1,362 in Brawley.
The median home
28% more
$370,900 in Kerman against $290,700 in Brawley.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F colder
Normal January lows are 39°F in Kerman against 42°F in Brawley; July highs are 98°F against 108°F (summers 10°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Brawley
Kerman
Opportunity: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
33 · Bottom 9%
vs
37 · Bottom 13%
Growth: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
53 · Top 43%
vs
56 · Top 37%
Climate: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
57 · Bottom 9%
vs
70 · Bottom 47%
Physical resilience: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
9 · Bottom 3%
vs
12 · Bottom 8%
Housing affordability: Brawley is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 43%
vs
58 · Bottom 33%
Schools: Brawley is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
32 · Bottom 27%
vs
29 · Bottom 23%
Access: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Access
66 · Bottom 9%
vs
85 · Bottom 27%
Economic stability: Kerman is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
31 · Bottom 10%
vs
35 · Bottom 15%

Measured values

MetricBrawleyKermanSource period
Population27,28316,8152024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$59,311 ±$6,287$59,799 ±$17,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$26,681 ±$2,918$27,069 ±$3,8642024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,373/sq mi5,024/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$290,700$370,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$988 — more favorable$1,2232024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,362 — more favorable$1,664FY2026
Cost of living index100.2 — more favorable104.02023
Homeownership rate51.6%51.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate16.8%7.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.6%−0.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate15.9% ±3%16.0% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate20.4% ±5%21.8% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)542712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable1.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.0%+27.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high108°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low42°F39°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation2.4"10.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport58 mi19 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute19.8 min — more favorable23.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age30.631.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1072024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.2 — more favorable22.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.6% — more favorable32.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.7%50.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility78.0%87.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Brawley

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Kerman

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Brawley
—
Brawley: Your Score
41
Area Score
Kerman
—
Kerman: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Brawley, CA · Kerman, CA · How this is calculated: methodology