Bountiful vs Woods Cross

Which is the better fit for you?

Bountiful, UT
65
Area Score
Top 27% nationally
Woods Cross, UT
69
Area Score
Top 18% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Woods Cross receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bountiful to Woods Cross

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 96.1 against 96.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,614 in Woods Cross against $1,614 in Bountiful.
The median home
7% less
$497,400 in Woods Cross against $532,200 in Bountiful.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 24°F in Woods Cross against 24°F in Bountiful; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bountiful
Woods Cross
Opportunity
66 · Top 30%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth: Woods Cross is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
62 · Top 26%
Climate
55 · Bottom 6%
vs
55 · Bottom 6%
Physical resilience
83 · Top 20%
vs
83 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Woods Cross is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
59 · Bottom 34%
vs
67 · Top 50%
Schools: Bountiful is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
64 · Top 31%
vs
63 · Top 32%
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Woods Cross is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 42%
vs
76 · Top 10%

Measured values

MetricBountifulWoods CrossSource period
Population45,02311,5312024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$104,785$120,543 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$42,416 ±$2,461$46,530 ±$5,8872024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,412/sq mi3,008/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$532,200$497,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,565 — more favorable$1,7712024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,614$1,614FY2026
Cost of living index96.196.12023
Homeownership rate71.3%81.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.4%−1.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher47.7% — more favorable33.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.5% ±2%4.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)414712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.94.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+127.8%+123.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low24°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation15.5"15.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute24.1 min21.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.732.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1552024-25 school year
Students per teacher23.722.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.1% — more favorable47.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.4%55.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility18.1%17.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bountiful
—
Bountiful: Your Score
65
Area Score
Woods Cross
—
Woods Cross: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bountiful, UT · Woods Cross, UT · How this is calculated: methodology