Borger vs Pampa

Which is the better fit for you?

Borger, TX
45
Area Score
Bottom 9% nationally
Pampa, TX
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Pampa receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Borger to Pampa

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Borger or Pampa, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$64 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,037 in Pampa against $973 in Borger.
The median home
3% less
$100,700 in Pampa against $103,400 in Borger.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F colder
Normal January lows are 23°F in Pampa against 28°F in Borger; July highs are 93°F against 95°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Borger
Pampa
Opportunity: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
47 · Bottom 30%
vs
50 · Bottom 38%
Growth: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
13 · Bottom 2%
vs
20 · Bottom 6%
Climate: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 13%
vs
67 · Bottom 38%
Physical resilience: Borger is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
27 · Bottom 22%
vs
23 · Bottom 17%
Housing affordability: Borger is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
82 · Top 9%
vs
72 · Top 34%
Schools: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
50 · Top 49%
Access: Borger is the more favorable of the two.
Access
75 · Bottom 15%
vs
67 · Bottom 9%
Economic stability: Pampa is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
27 · Bottom 7%
vs
34 · Bottom 13%

Measured values

MetricBorgerPampaSource period
Population12,22616,6592024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$61,583 ±$9,045$56,626 ±$6,9572024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,565 ±$2,643$35,014 ±$4,4152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,354/sq mi1,847/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$103,400$100,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$910 ±$124$934 ±$462024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$973 — more favorable$1,037FY2026
Homeownership rate79.1%74.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2% — more favorable−0.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate17.3% ±4%17.0% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.9% ±4%16.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−50.0%−50.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low28°F23°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation18.6"22.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport35 mi — more favorable48 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate20.9 min ±2.5 min18.4 min ±1.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.635.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools662024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.8 — more favorable14.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.8%56.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.0% — more favorable37.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility57.8%62.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Borger

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire, hail.

Pampa

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Borger
—
Borger: Your Score
45
Area Score
Pampa
—
Pampa: Your Score
47
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Borger, TX · Pampa, TX · How this is calculated: methodology