Bloomington vs St. Louis Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Bloomington, MN
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
St. Louis Park, MN
67
Area Score
Top 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. Louis Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bloomington to St. Louis Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 104.3 against 104.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in St. Louis Park against $1,709 in Bloomington.
The median home
7% more
$386,800 in St. Louis Park against $361,700 in Bloomington.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 7°F in St. Louis Park against 9°F in Bloomington; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bloomington
St. Louis Park
Opportunity: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
56 · Bottom 49%
Growth: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
8 · Bottom 1%
vs
66 · Top 20%
Climate: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience
93 · Top 7%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
81 · Top 10%
Schools: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
32 · Bottom 27%
vs
37 · Bottom 33%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
69 · Top 27%
vs
74 · Top 15%

Measured values

MetricBloomingtonSt. Louis ParkSource period
Population88,66549,5942024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$93,211$101,648 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,173$64,370 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,555/sq mi4,668/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$361,700$386,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,561 — more favorable$1,6442024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,709$1,709FY2026
Cost of living index104.3104.32023
Homeownership rate65.7%57.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.2%64.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate8.4% ±2%6.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)461312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.012.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−98.8%+20333.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low9°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.6"30.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate22.4 min ±0.7 min21.9 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.136.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools23162024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.8 — more favorable17.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.2%49.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.8%59.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility48.8%36.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bloomington

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

St. Louis Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bloomington
—
Bloomington: Your Score
56
Area Score
St. Louis Park
—
St. Louis Park: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bloomington, MN · St. Louis Park, MN · How this is calculated: methodology