Bloomington vs Brooklyn Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Bloomington, MN
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
Brooklyn Park, MN
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bloomington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bloomington to Brooklyn Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 104.3 against 104.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in Brooklyn Park against $1,709 in Bloomington.
The median home
7% less
$336,200 in Brooklyn Park against $361,700 in Bloomington.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 7°F in Brooklyn Park against 9°F in Bloomington; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bloomington
Brooklyn Park
Opportunity: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
42 · Bottom 21%
Growth: Brooklyn Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
8 · Bottom 1%
vs
27 · Bottom 11%
Climate: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience
93 · Top 7%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
32 · Bottom 27%
vs
17 · Bottom 9%
Access: Bloomington is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
92 · Top 50%
Economic stability
69 · Top 27%
vs
69 · Top 27%

Measured values

MetricBloomingtonBrooklyn ParkSource period
Population88,66583,8762024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$93,211 ±$3,400$89,891 ±$4,1132024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,173 — more favorable$38,9782024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,555/sq mi3,217/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$361,700$336,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,561$1,325 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,709$1,709FY2026
Cost of living index104.3104.32023
Homeownership rate65.7%70.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4% — more favorable4.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.2% — more favorable32.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate8.4% ±2%9.6% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)411012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.01.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−98.8%−42.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low9°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.6"30.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable17 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate22.4 min ±0.7 min23.1 min ±0.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.135.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools23352024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.814.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.2% — more favorable34.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.8% — more favorable45.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility48.8%64.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bloomington

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Brooklyn Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bloomington
—
Bloomington: Your Score
56
Area Score
Brooklyn Park
—
Brooklyn Park: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bloomington, MN · Brooklyn Park, MN · How this is calculated: methodology