Blackhawk vs Saratoga

Which is the better fit for you?

Blackhawk, CA
53
Area Score
Bottom 31% nationally
Saratoga, CA
—
Area Score

Missing required signal: opportunity.

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Blackhawk to Saratoga

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 113.1 against 117.6 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$558 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $3,470 in Saratoga against $2,912 in Blackhawk.
The median home
About the same
$2,000,001 in Saratoga against $2,000,001 in Blackhawk.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 42°F in Saratoga against 38°F in Blackhawk; July highs are 81°F against 88°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Blackhawk
Saratoga
Growth: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
36 · Bottom 24%
vs
42 · Bottom 32%
Climate: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
81 · Top 15%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
23 · Bottom 17%
vs
25 · Bottom 20%
Housing affordability: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
45 · Bottom 16%
vs
47 · Bottom 18%
Schools
79 · Top 12%
vs
79 · Top 13%
Access: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 42%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Saratoga is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
63 · Top 40%
vs
64 · Top 37%

Measured values

MetricBlackhawkSaratogaSource period
Population10,13730,3192024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$245,208$250,000+ — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$130,578 ±$21,104$124,686 ±$7,6762024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,755/sq mi2,373/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$2,000,000+$2,000,000+2024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$3,500+$3,500+2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,912 — more favorable$3,470FY2026
Cost of living index117.6113.1 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate89.3%86.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.6%−1.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher69.7%81.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.7% ±4%3.1% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,4659712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.33.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+17.0%−2.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F42°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation15.2"13.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport18 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute38.9 min27.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age50.351.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4102024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.921.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency80.2% — more favorable75.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency82.8% — more favorable82.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility7.4%17.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Blackhawk

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Saratoga

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Blackhawk
—
Blackhawk: Your Score
53
Area Score
Saratoga
—
Saratoga: Your Score
—
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Blackhawk, CA · Saratoga, CA · How this is calculated: methodology