Bixby vs Edmond

Which is the better fit for you?

Bixby, OK
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Edmond, OK
67
Area Score
Top 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bixby receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bixby to Edmond

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% higher
Regional price level 91.4 against 89.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$37 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,542 in Edmond against $1,506 in Bixby.
The median home
5% more
$351,400 in Edmond against $334,200 in Bixby.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 27°F in Edmond against 28°F in Bixby; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Bixby
Edmond
Opportunity: Edmond is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
68 · Top 27%
Growth: Edmond is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 24%
vs
64 · Top 22%
Climate: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 20%
vs
61 · Bottom 19%
Physical resilience: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
48 · Bottom 41%
Housing affordability: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
70 · Top 39%
Schools: Edmond is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
88 · Top 5%
Access: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Access
92 · Bottom 49%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
73 · Top 16%
vs
63 · Top 39%

Measured values

MetricBixbyEdmondSource period
Population30,15596,8252024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$104,404 ±$7,712$103,183 ±$3,2382024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$49,917$56,320 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,172/sq mi1,147/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$334,200$351,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,393 ±$92$1,344 ±$362024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,506 — more favorable$1,542FY2026
Cost of living index89.9 — more favorable91.42023
Homeownership rate76.0%70.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%3.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.6%−1.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.3%57.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.3% ±1%6.8% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)23168912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents7.7 — more favorable7.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−48.6%−32.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low28°F27°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation42.1"30.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi — more favorable22 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.2 min24.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.437.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8192024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.216.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.4%55.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency53.1%56.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility27.2%31.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bixby

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

Edmond

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bixby
—
Bixby: Your Score
69
Area Score
Edmond
—
Edmond: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bixby, OK · Edmond, OK · How this is calculated: methodology