Bixby vs Broken Arrow

Which is the better fit for you?

Bixby, OK
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Broken Arrow, OK
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bixby receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bixby to Broken Arrow

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 89.9 against 89.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$71 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,576 in Broken Arrow against $1,506 in Bixby.
The median home
25% less
$250,400 in Broken Arrow against $334,200 in Bixby.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 28°F in Broken Arrow against 28°F in Bixby; July highs are 94°F against 94°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bixby
Broken Arrow
Opportunity: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
63 · Top 36%
Growth: Broken Arrow is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 24%
vs
87 · Top 1%
Climate
62 · Bottom 20%
vs
62 · Bottom 20%
Physical resilience: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Housing affordability: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
79 · Top 14%
Schools: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
43 · Bottom 42%
Access: Broken Arrow is the more favorable of the two.
Access
92 · Bottom 49%
vs
95 · Top 38%
Economic stability: Bixby is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
73 · Top 16%
vs
63 · Top 40%

Measured values

MetricBixbyBroken ArrowSource period
Population30,155118,1802024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$104,404 — more favorable$86,7652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$49,917 ±$2,577$46,371 ±$5,2972024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,172/sq mi1,877/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$334,200$250,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,393 ±$92$1,320 ±$272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,506 — more favorable$1,576FY2026
Cost of living index89.989.92023
Homeownership rate76.0%72.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1%4.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.6% — more favorable−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.3% — more favorable35.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.3% — more favorable8.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2311,52912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents7.712.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−48.6%+105.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low28°F28°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation42.1"42.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi13 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.2 min23.3 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.437.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8342024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.217.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.4% — more favorable32.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency53.1% — more favorable37.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility27.2%50.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bixby

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

Broken Arrow

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bixby
—
Bixby: Your Score
69
Area Score
Broken Arrow
—
Broken Arrow: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bixby, OK · Broken Arrow, OK · How this is calculated: methodology