Beverly Hills vs Rancho Palos Verdes

Which is the better fit for you?

Beverly Hills, CA
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
52
Area Score
Bottom 25% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Beverly Hills and Rancho Palos Verdes receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Beverly Hills to Rancho Palos Verdes

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 114.7 against 114.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$190 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $4,350 in Rancho Palos Verdes against $4,160 in Beverly Hills.
The median home
20% less
$1,609,400 in Rancho Palos Verdes against $2,000,001 in Beverly Hills.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 47°F in Rancho Palos Verdes against 49°F in Beverly Hills; July highs are 77°F against 75°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Beverly Hills
Rancho Palos Verdes
Opportunity
50 · Bottom 38%
vs
50 · Bottom 38%
Growth: Rancho Palos Verdes is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
28 · Bottom 12%
vs
35 · Bottom 22%
Climate
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Physical resilience
11 · Bottom 4%
vs
11 · Bottom 4%
Housing affordability: Beverly Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
40 · Bottom 10%
vs
32 · Bottom 4%
Schools: Beverly Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
82 · Top 9%
vs
75 · Top 18%
Access: Beverly Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
100 · Top 3%
vs
97 · Top 23%
Economic stability: Rancho Palos Verdes is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
62 · Top 41%

Measured values

MetricBeverly HillsRancho Palos VerdesSource period
Population31,62440,8642024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$132,977$179,623 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$113,837 — more favorable$87,9932024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,540/sq mi3,033/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$2,000,000+$1,609,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,830 — more favorable$3,500+2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$4,160 — more favorable$4,350FY2026
Cost of living index114.7114.72023
Homeownership rate41.0%80.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable4.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate69.9% ±4%70.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.9%4.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)271612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.9 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+42.1%+77.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high75°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low49°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation13.4"13.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable14 miNASR current cycle
Average commute27.7 min — more favorable35.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age47.949.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3102024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.4 — more favorable21.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency62.7%69.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.9%76.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility30.3%27.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Beverly Hills

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Rancho Palos Verdes

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Beverly Hills
—
Beverly Hills: Your Score
52
Area Score
Rancho Palos Verdes
—
Rancho Palos Verdes: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Beverly Hills, CA · Rancho Palos Verdes, CA · How this is calculated: methodology