Bellingham vs Port Angeles

Which is the better fit for you?

Bellingham, WA
55
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally
Port Angeles, WA
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bellingham receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bellingham to Port Angeles

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Port Angeles, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$528 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,266 in Port Angeles against $1,794 in Bellingham.
The median home
41% less
$370,200 in Port Angeles against $627,500 in Bellingham.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 33°F in Port Angeles against 34°F in Bellingham; July highs are 68°F against 73°F (summers 5°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bellingham
Port Angeles
Opportunity: Bellingham is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
71 · Top 23%
vs
60 · Top 41%
Growth: Bellingham is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
62 · Top 26%
vs
57 · Top 36%
Climate: Bellingham is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 37%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience: Bellingham is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 44%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: Port Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
33 · Bottom 4%
vs
44 · Bottom 14%
Schools: Port Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 35%
vs
49 · Bottom 49%
Access: Port Angeles is the more favorable of the two.
Access
47 · Bottom 3%
vs
58 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Bellingham is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
54 · Bottom 43%
vs
49 · Bottom 34%

Measured values

MetricBellinghamPort AngelesSource period
Population93,43820,1182024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$66,755 ±$3,771$62,606 ±$3,3672024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,947 — more favorable$36,6972024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,314/sq mi1,878/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$627,500$370,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,577$1,170 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,794$1,266 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate44.6%55.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable3.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.6% — more favorable−0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.5% — more favorable30.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.4% ±2%11.3% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)6215612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.6 — more favorable2.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.4%+69.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F68°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.7"29.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport85 mi67 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute19.7 min18.0 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.142.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools34122024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.916.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.0%51.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency65.8%66.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility40.8%55.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bellingham

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Port Angeles

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bellingham
—
Bellingham: Your Score
55
Area Score
Port Angeles
—
Port Angeles: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bellingham, WA · Port Angeles, WA · How this is calculated: methodology