Beavercreek vs Piqua

Which is the better fit for you?

Beavercreek, OH
79
Area Score
Top 1% nationally
Piqua, OH
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Beavercreek receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Beavercreek to Piqua

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 92.4 against 92.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$264 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,220 in Piqua against $1,484 in Beavercreek.
The median home
50% less
$138,600 in Piqua against $279,600 in Beavercreek.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 22°F in Piqua against 22°F in Beavercreek; July highs are 86°F against 86°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Beavercreek
Piqua
Opportunity: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
86 · Top 2%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth: Piqua is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 25%
vs
65 · Top 21%
Climate
68 · Bottom 42%
vs
68 · Bottom 41%
Physical resilience: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
93 · Top 8%
vs
88 · Top 14%
Housing affordability: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
88 · Top 3%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
66 · Top 29%
vs
35 · Bottom 31%
Access: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 34%
vs
95 · Top 40%
Economic stability: Beavercreek is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
65 · Top 36%
vs
45 · Bottom 28%

Measured values

MetricBeavercreekPiquaSource period
Population47,12620,6462024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$110,088 — more favorable$67,7962024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$51,929 — more favorable$31,7412024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,772/sq mi1,569/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$279,600$138,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,457$922 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,484$1,220 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index92.492.42023
Homeownership rate71.8%65.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.1%3.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.5% — more favorable+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher52.0% — more favorable15.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.6% — more favorable17.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)55535712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.3 — more favorable3.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−11.5%+8.5% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low22°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation41.0"41.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi — more favorable17 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.6 min ±1.0 min20.8 min ±1.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.538.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1562024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.016.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency70.6% — more favorable54.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency74.9% — more favorable60.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility24.5%39.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Beavercreek

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Piqua

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Beavercreek
—
Beavercreek: Your Score
79
Area Score
Piqua
—
Piqua: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Beavercreek, OH · Piqua, OH · How this is calculated: methodology