Beaver Dam vs Sheboygan

Which is the better fit for you?

Beaver Dam, WI
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally
Sheboygan, WI
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Beaver Dam receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Beaver Dam to Sheboygan

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Beaver Dam, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$36 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,116 in Sheboygan against $1,080 in Beaver Dam.
The median home
14% less
$174,200 in Sheboygan against $201,900 in Beaver Dam.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 12°F in Sheboygan against 9°F in Beaver Dam; July highs are 80°F against 80°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Beaver Dam
Sheboygan
Opportunity: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
81 · Top 6%
vs
67 · Top 29%
Growth: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
69 · Top 17%
vs
68 · Top 17%
Climate: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
53 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience: Sheboygan is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
98 · Top 1%
Housing affordability: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
89 · Top 2%
vs
85 · Top 5%
Schools: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
47 · Bottom 46%
vs
36 · Bottom 31%
Access: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Access
83 · Bottom 25%
vs
76 · Bottom 17%
Economic stability: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 32%
vs
55 · Bottom 44%

Measured values

MetricBeaver DamSheboyganSource period
Population16,56549,6452024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$66,673 ±$4,155$62,927 ±$2,4562024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$37,703 — more favorable$33,1742024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,231/sq mi3,067/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$201,900$174,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$959 ±$42$924 ±$382024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,080 — more favorable$1,116FY2026
Homeownership rate55.3%60.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.7% — more favorable3.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+3.2% — more favorable+0.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate25.1% ±3%23.4% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate8.9% — more favorable12.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)7136612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.37.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+115.2%+510.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high80°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low9°F12°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.3"29.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport34 mi — more favorable44 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.0 min18.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.136.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8262024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.0 — more favorable13.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.0% — more favorable35.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.1% — more favorable36.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility48.2%60.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Beaver Dam
—
Beaver Dam: Your Score
74
Area Score
Sheboygan
—
Sheboygan: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Beaver Dam, WI · Sheboygan, WI · How this is calculated: methodology