Ballenger Creek vs Lexington Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Ballenger Creek, MD
65
Area Score
Top 27% nationally
Lexington Park, MD
64
Area Score
Top 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Ballenger Creek receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Ballenger Creek to Lexington Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
6% lower
Regional price level 102.7 against 109.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$1,037 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,833 in Lexington Park against $2,870 in Ballenger Creek.
The median home
20% less
$309,700 in Lexington Park against $387,300 in Ballenger Creek.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 30°F in Lexington Park against 27°F in Ballenger Creek; July highs are 87°F against 89°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

26 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Ballenger Creek
Lexington Park
Opportunity: Ballenger Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 45%
vs
52 · Bottom 41%
Growth
34 · Bottom 20%
vs
34 · Bottom 20%
Climate: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 30%
vs
77 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 13%
vs
92 · Top 10%
Housing affordability: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
70 · Top 40%
Schools: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
59 · Top 38%
vs
61 · Top 35%
Access: Ballenger Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Access
84 · Bottom 27%
vs
64 · Bottom 8%
Economic stability: Ballenger Creek is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
65 · Top 35%
vs
47 · Bottom 30%

Measured values

MetricBallenger CreekLexington ParkSource period
Population26,39013,2522024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$108,944 ±$7,475$94,799 ±$19,0422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$46,569 ±$3,441$46,816 ±$4,5552024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,444/sq mi2,185/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$387,300$309,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,987$1,755 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,870$1,833 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index109.5102.7 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate64.7%47.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.3% — more favorable−2.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.4% — more favorable39.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.8% ±4%14.2% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,02522812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.6 — more favorable2.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−31.7%−16.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low27°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.5"45.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport30 mi — more favorable65 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.6 min21.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.331.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools962024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.314.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.8%41.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.0% — more favorable48.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility55.9%53.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Ballenger Creek

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Lexington Park

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, drought, strong wind.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Ballenger Creek
—
Ballenger Creek: Your Score
65
Area Score
Lexington Park
—
Lexington Park: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Ballenger Creek, MD · Lexington Park, MD · How this is calculated: methodology