Baldwin Park vs San Pablo

Which is the better fit for you?

Baldwin Park, CA
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally
San Pablo, CA
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

San Pablo receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Baldwin Park to San Pablo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% higher
Regional price level 117.6 against 114.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$348 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,912 in San Pablo against $3,260 in Baldwin Park.
The median home
9% less
$551,700 in San Pablo against $606,900 in Baldwin Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 47°F in San Pablo against 46°F in Baldwin Park; July highs are 66°F against 84°F (summers 18°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

35 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Baldwin Park
San Pablo
Opportunity: Baldwin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
34 · Bottom 10%
vs
33 · Bottom 9%
Growth: Baldwin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
20 · Bottom 6%
vs
12 · Bottom 1%
Climate: Baldwin Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
100 · Top 4%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: San Pablo is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
11 · Bottom 4%
vs
23 · Bottom 17%
Housing affordability: San Pablo is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
35 · Bottom 6%
vs
41 · Bottom 12%
Schools: San Pablo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
41 · Bottom 38%
vs
49 · Bottom 49%
Access: San Pablo is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 48%
vs
94 · Top 43%
Economic stability: San Pablo is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 38%
vs
53 · Bottom 40%

Measured values

MetricBaldwin ParkSan PabloSource period
Population70,13831,7202024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$80,663 ±$3,146$79,478 ±$3,3422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$26,703$30,103 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density10,576/sq mi12,088/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$606,900$551,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,867 — more favorable$2,0182024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,260$2,912 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index114.7 — more favorable117.62023
Homeownership rate57.7%42.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1%4.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8% — more favorable−2.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate15.1% ±1%16.8% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.5% ±2%13.1% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)63512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.9 — more favorable0.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−50.0%−76.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F66°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.9"22.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport21 mi18 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.5 min — more favorable35.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.234.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher21.5 — more favorable22.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.6%44.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.9%56.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Baldwin Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

San Pablo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Baldwin Park
—
Baldwin Park: Your Score
41
Area Score
San Pablo
—
San Pablo: Your Score
43
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Baldwin Park, CA · San Pablo, CA · How this is calculated: methodology