Aurora vs St. Louis Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Aurora, IL
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally
St. Louis Park, MN
67
Area Score
Top 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. Louis Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Aurora to St. Louis Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% higher
Regional price level 104.3 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$206 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in St. Louis Park against $1,915 in Aurora.
The median home
41% more
$386,800 in St. Louis Park against $274,800 in Aurora.
The weather you would swap
Winters 8°F colder
Normal January lows are 7°F in St. Louis Park against 15°F in Aurora; July highs are 83°F against 84°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

36 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Aurora
St. Louis Park
Opportunity: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 46%
vs
56 · Bottom 49%
Growth: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
67 · Top 19%
vs
66 · Top 20%
Climate: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
79 · Top 25%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
77 · Top 21%
vs
81 · Top 10%
Schools: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
41 · Bottom 38%
vs
37 · Bottom 33%
Access: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
88 · Bottom 34%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: St. Louis Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 32%
vs
74 · Top 15%

Measured values

MetricAuroraSt. Louis ParkSource period
Population179,89849,5942024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$93,633$101,648 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$40,937$64,370 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,992/sq mi4,668/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$274,800$386,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,596 ±$55$1,644 ±$432024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,915$1,709 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5 — more favorable104.32023
Homeownership rate66.4%57.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.4% — more favorable−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher38.5%64.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.1%6.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)84461312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.712.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+176.7%+20333.3% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.8"30.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport25 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute29.4 min21.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.236.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools52162024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.6 — more favorable17.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency29.6%49.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency32.7%59.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility45.2%36.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise. This is common on these pages by construction: Aurora and St. Louis Park were paired because they are alike, and the more alike two places are, the less a sample of this size can tell them apart.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Illinois and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Aurora

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

St. Louis Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Aurora
—
Aurora: Your Score
64
Area Score
St. Louis Park
—
St. Louis Park: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Aurora, IL · St. Louis Park, MN · How this is calculated: methodology