Auburn vs Biddeford

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, ME
62
Area Score
Top 40% nationally
Biddeford, ME
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Auburn receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Biddeford

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% higher
Regional price level 104.4 against 100.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
41% more
$396,600 in Biddeford against $282,000 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Biddeford against 12°F in Auburn; July highs are 80°F against 79°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Auburn
Biddeford
Opportunity: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
65 · Top 32%
vs
63 · Top 36%
Growth: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
71 · Top 14%
vs
56 · Top 38%
Climate: Biddeford is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
54 · Bottom 2%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
84 · Top 18%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability: Biddeford is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 47%
vs
74 · Top 29%
Schools: Biddeford is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
30 · Bottom 25%
vs
37 · Bottom 33%
Access: Biddeford is the more favorable of the two.
Access
46 · Bottom 3%
vs
61 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Biddeford is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricAuburnBiddefordSource period
Population24,60222,4982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$66,647 ±$4,610$72,333 ±$4,1752024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$36,895 ±$2,969$39,562 ±$2,2682024 ACS 5-Year
Population density415/sq mi748/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$282,000$396,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,041 — more favorable$1,2922024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index100.9 — more favorable104.42023
Homeownership rate59.1%48.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.8% — more favorable−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher27.8%32.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.3% ±3%13.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)10810912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.44.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+33.3%−11.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high79°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low12°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.0"48.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport86 mi63 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.4 min ±1.6 min24.8 min ±1.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.435.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools872024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.612.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency26.0%26.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.7%49.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility59.3%62.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Auburn

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, hurricane, drought.

Biddeford

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, hurricane, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
62
Area Score
Biddeford
—
Biddeford: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, ME · Biddeford, ME · How this is calculated: methodology