Auburn vs Elk Grove

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, CA
53
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally
Elk Grove, CA
63
Area Score
Top 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Elk Grove receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Elk Grove

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.1 against 109.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$70 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,980 in Elk Grove against $1,910 in Auburn.
The median home
6% less
$630,100 in Elk Grove against $672,500 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 39°F in Elk Grove against 38°F in Auburn; July highs are 93°F against 93°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Auburn
Elk Grove
Opportunity: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 44%
vs
53 · Bottom 43%
Growth: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
50 · Bottom 49%
vs
62 · Top 25%
Climate: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
76 · Top 27%
vs
79 · Top 18%
Physical resilience: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
44 · Bottom 34%
vs
63 · Top 45%
Housing affordability: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
33 · Bottom 5%
vs
52 · Bottom 24%
Schools: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
48 · Bottom 48%
vs
59 · Top 38%
Access: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
95 · Top 39%
Economic stability: Elk Grove is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
46 · Bottom 29%
vs
65 · Top 36%

Measured values

MetricAuburnElk GroveSource period
Population13,768179,1552024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$82,674$125,924 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$53,951 — more favorable$46,3472024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,918/sq mi4,205/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$672,500$630,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,501 — more favorable$2,2622024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,910 — more favorable$1,980FY2026
Cost of living index109.1109.12023
Homeownership rate62.4%73.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4% — more favorable4.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−2.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate40.6% ±4%38.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.5%7.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)171,14412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.26.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+70.0%−17.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F39°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.1"18.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport23 mi18 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min — more favorable32.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age47.539.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7392024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.2 — more favorable22.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.6%50.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.3%63.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility45.5%50.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Auburn

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Elk Grove

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
53
Area Score
Elk Grove
—
Elk Grove: Your Score
63
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, CA · Elk Grove, CA · How this is calculated: methodology