Auburn vs Opelika

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, AL
71
Area Score
Top 11% nationally
Opelika, AL
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Auburn receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Opelika

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 87.6 against 87.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,181 in Opelika against $1,181 in Auburn.
The median home
34% less
$241,800 in Opelika against $364,800 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Opelika against 35°F in Auburn; July highs are 93°F against 89°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Auburn
Opelika
Opportunity
71 · Top 22%
vs
71 · Top 21%
Growth: Opelika is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
93 · Top 1%
Climate: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
84 · Top 10%
vs
72 · Top 43%
Physical resilience: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
70 · Top 36%
vs
67 · Top 40%
Housing affordability: Opelika is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 25%
vs
66 · Bottom 49%
Schools: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
80 · Top 12%
vs
54 · Top 44%
Access: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Access
69 · Bottom 10%
vs
62 · Bottom 7%
Economic stability: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 33%
vs
41 · Bottom 23%

Measured values

MetricAuburnOpelikaSource period
Population80,59432,8202024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$63,668 ±$4,618$65,004 ±$6,5262024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,018 ±$1,726$35,177 ±$2,4592024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,280/sq mi534/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$364,800$241,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,098$950 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,181$1,181FY2026
Cost of living index87.687.62023
Homeownership rate53.1%69.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2%−0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher64.1% — more favorable36.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.1% — more favorable15.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,0401,00912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents12.930.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+8.3%+116.5% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.5"48.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport57 mi — more favorable64 miNASR current cycle
Average commute21.3 min — more favorable23.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age25.939.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools14142024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.016.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency72.8% — more favorable51.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency63.9% — more favorable46.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility33.5%66.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
71
Area Score
Opelika
—
Opelika: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, AL · Opelika, AL · How this is calculated: methodology