Ashwaubenon vs Beaver Dam

Which is the better fit for you?

Ashwaubenon, WI
72
Area Score
Top 8% nationally
Beaver Dam, WI
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Beaver Dam receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Ashwaubenon to Beaver Dam

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Beaver Dam, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$84 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,080 in Beaver Dam against $1,164 in Ashwaubenon.
The median home
24% less
$201,900 in Beaver Dam against $266,600 in Ashwaubenon.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 9°F in Beaver Dam against 11°F in Ashwaubenon; July highs are 80°F against 81°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Ashwaubenon
Beaver Dam
Opportunity: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
80 · Top 8%
vs
81 · Top 6%
Growth: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
67 · Top 19%
vs
69 · Top 17%
Climate: Ashwaubenon is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
57 · Bottom 8%
vs
55 · Bottom 5%
Physical resilience: Ashwaubenon is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
95 · Top 4%
vs
94 · Top 5%
Housing affordability: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
72 · Top 34%
vs
89 · Top 2%
Schools: Beaver Dam is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
47 · Bottom 46%
Access: Ashwaubenon is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
83 · Bottom 25%
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
66 · Top 32%

Measured values

MetricAshwaubenonBeaver DamSource period
Population17,31416,5652024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$69,667 ±$7,450$66,673 ±$4,1552024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,680 — more favorable$37,7032024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,398/sq mi2,231/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$266,600$201,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$964 ±$43$959 ±$422024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,164$1,080 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate59.8%55.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.1%2.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.7%+3.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher36.2% — more favorable25.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.2% ±3%8.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)507112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.94.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+22.0%+115.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high81°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low11°F9°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.6"36.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport2 mi — more favorable34 miNASR current cycle
Average commute17.8 min — more favorable26.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.140.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools982024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.913.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.1% — more favorable40.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.5%40.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility45.6%48.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Ashwaubenon
—
Ashwaubenon: Your Score
72
Area Score
Beaver Dam
—
Beaver Dam: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Ashwaubenon, WI · Beaver Dam, WI · How this is calculated: methodology