Arlington vs Lake Stickney

Which is the better fit for you?

Arlington, WA
53
Area Score
Bottom 31% nationally
Lake Stickney, WA
56
Area Score
Bottom 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake Stickney receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Arlington to Lake Stickney

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$341 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,160 in Lake Stickney against $2,501 in Arlington.
The median home
15% more
$620,300 in Lake Stickney against $538,800 in Arlington.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Lake Stickney against 37°F in Arlington; July highs are 72°F against 72°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Arlington
Lake Stickney
Opportunity: Lake Stickney is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
54 · Bottom 44%
Growth: Arlington is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
62 · Top 26%
vs
57 · Top 35%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
45 · Bottom 35%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Lake Stickney is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
44 · Bottom 14%
vs
53 · Bottom 24%
Schools
48 · Bottom 47%
vs
48 · Bottom 47%
Access: Lake Stickney is the more favorable of the two.
Access
72 · Bottom 13%
vs
86 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability: Lake Stickney is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 33%
vs
57 · Bottom 47%

Measured values

MetricArlingtonLake StickneySource period
Population21,09515,8902024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$88,231 ±$8,852$94,020 ±$17,4882024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$44,206 ±$4,836$46,772 ±$3,9622024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,116/sq mi7,989/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$538,800$620,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,905 ±$115$1,806 ±$732024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,501$2,160 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate62.2%53.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%5.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7%−0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.8%37.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.8% ±3%10.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1003,50612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.7 — more favorable4.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−9.1%−9.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high72°F72°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"33.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport45 mi24 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate32.6 min ±1.8 min33.8 min ±3.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.634.82024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.818.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.5%52.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.4%67.4%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Arlington

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Lake Stickney

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Arlington
—
Arlington: Your Score
53
Area Score
Lake Stickney
—
Lake Stickney: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Arlington, WA · Lake Stickney, WA · How this is calculated: methodology