Algonquin vs Aurora

Which is the better fit for you?

Algonquin, IL
68
Area Score
Top 19% nationally
Aurora, IL
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Algonquin receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Algonquin to Aurora

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$497 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,915 in Aurora against $2,412 in Algonquin.
The median home
22% less
$274,800 in Aurora against $351,000 in Algonquin.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 15°F in Aurora against 16°F in Algonquin; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Algonquin
Aurora
Opportunity: Algonquin is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
58 · Top 47%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
50 · Bottom 49%
vs
67 · Top 19%
Climate: Algonquin is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 15%
vs
59 · Bottom 12%
Physical resilience: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
74 · Top 31%
vs
79 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Algonquin is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 5%
vs
77 · Top 21%
Schools: Algonquin is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
75 · Top 17%
vs
41 · Bottom 38%
Access: Aurora is the more favorable of the two.
Access
87 · Bottom 34%
vs
88 · Bottom 34%
Economic stability: Algonquin is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
80 · Top 5%
vs
66 · Top 32%

Measured values

MetricAlgonquinAuroraSource period
Population30,067179,8982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$134,525 — more favorable$93,6332024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$54,037 — more favorable$40,9372024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,401/sq mi3,992/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$351,000$274,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,723 ±$210$1,596 ±$552024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,412$1,915 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate88.2%66.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1% — more favorable4.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.4%−1.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher43.6% — more favorable38.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.9% — more favorable9.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)11584412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.84.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−37.8%+176.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.2"33.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport25 mi25 miNASR current cycle
Average commute33.1 min29.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.435.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools12522024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.3 — more favorable15.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.1% — more favorable29.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency48.1% — more favorable32.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility37.8%45.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Algonquin
—
Algonquin: Your Score
68
Area Score
Aurora
—
Aurora: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Algonquin, IL · Aurora, IL · How this is calculated: methodology