Abington vs Mendota Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

Abington, MA
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally
Mendota Heights, MN
68
Area Score
Top 19% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Abington and Mendota Heights receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Abington to Mendota Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
6% lower
Regional price level 104.3 against 110.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
4% less
$520,300 in Mendota Heights against $539,600 in Abington.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F colder
Normal January lows are 9°F in Mendota Heights against 19°F in Abington; July highs are 83°F against 82°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Abington
Mendota Heights
Opportunity
55 · Bottom 48%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Growth: Mendota Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
61 · Top 27%
vs
68 · Top 17%
Climate: Abington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
55 · Bottom 5%
Physical resilience: Abington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 13%
vs
88 · Top 14%
Housing affordability: Mendota Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 44%
vs
74 · Top 27%
Schools: Abington is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
63 · Top 32%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: Mendota Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 39%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Mendota Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 3%
vs
83 · Top 2%

Measured values

MetricAbingtonMendota HeightsSource period
Population17,05311,6122024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$125,400 ±$11,579$132,768 ±$14,6872024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$53,541$72,329 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,712/sq mi1,280/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$539,600$520,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,724 ±$250$1,631 ±$1392024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index110.4104.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate72.7%78.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8% — more favorable−2.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher40.0%67.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.2% ±2%2.9% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,37315012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.612.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+44.1%+2900.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F9°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation53.3"31.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi4 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute35.7 min21.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.147.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools512024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.4 — more favorable15.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.6%58.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.1%62.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Massachusetts and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Abington

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, hurricane.

Mendota Heights

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Abington
—
Abington: Your Score
68
Area Score
Mendota Heights
—
Mendota Heights: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Abington, MA · Mendota Heights, MN · How this is calculated: methodology