Compare

95671 vs 27358

Which is the better fit for you?

95671 — Folsom, CA
72
Area Score
Top 12% nationally
27358 — Summerfield, NC
Area Score

Missing required signal: growth.

Signals

95671
27358
Opportunity
62 · Top 35%
vs
66 · Top 27%
Climate
81 · Top 16%
vs
77 · Top 24%
Physical resilience
63 · Top 45%
vs
61 · Top 47%
Housing affordability
100 · Top 9%
vs
98 · Top 15%
Access
98 · Top 23%
vs
97 · Top 32%
Economic stability
65 · Top 39%
vs
76 · Top 19%

Measured values

Metric9567127358Source period
Population4,43215,6852024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$232,700$138,7172024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$5,311$60,1852024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,001/sq mi297/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,420$1,0222024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate0.0%94.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.0%4.0%June 2026
Employment change (year over year)-1.3%-1.2%June 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher2.1%54.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate0.0%5.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Average July high94°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.2"44.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi9 miNASR current cycle
Average commute11.7 min26.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.043.42024 ACS 5-Year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

Physical risk tradeoff

95671

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

27358

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

95671
75
Your Score
72
Area Score
27358
79
Your Score
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: 95671 — Folsom, CA · 27358 — Summerfield, NC · How this is calculated: methodology

95671 vs 27358: Location Comparison | AreaProfile