Compare

58105 vs 07849

Which is the better fit for you?

58105 — Fargo, ND
68
Area Score
Top 23% nationally
07849 — Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Area Score

Missing required signal: growth.

Signals

58105
07849
Opportunity
85 · Top 3%
vs
77 · Top 10%
Climate
49 · Bottom 1%
vs
62 · Bottom 24%
Physical resilience
59 · Top 49%
vs
57 · Bottom 48%
Access
90 · Bottom 41%
vs
86 · Bottom 30%
Economic stability
68 · Top 34%
vs
78 · Top 15%

Measured values

Metric5810507849Source period
Population2,8258,3802024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$123,636$117,2982024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$9,024$58,7712024 ACS 5-Year
Population density11,870/sq mi1,243/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate55.0%91.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.4%3.8%June 2026
Employment change (year over year)-0.6%0.9%June 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher86.5%48.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.6%3.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Average July high82°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low0°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation24.0"48.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport2 mi30 miNASR current cycle
Average commute14.9 min35.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age19.344.72024 ACS 5-Year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

Physical risk tradeoff

58105

Elevated or high exposure: winter weather, strong wind, hail.

07849

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

58105
69
Your Score
68
Area Score
07849
75
Your Score
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: 58105 — Fargo, ND · 07849 — Lake Hopatcong, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology

58105 vs 07849: Location Comparison | AreaProfile