Compare

33980 vs 34446

Which is the better fit for you?

33980 — Port Charlotte, FL
Area Score

Missing required signals: opportunity, growth.

34446 — Sugarmill Woods, FL
Area Score

Missing required signal: growth.

Signals

33980
34446
Climate
80 · Top 18%
vs
86 · Top 9%
Physical resilience
4 · Bottom 1%
vs
2 · Bottom 1%
Housing affordability
73 · Bottom 39%
vs
79 · Bottom 48%
Access
83 · Bottom 25%
vs
72 · Bottom 13%
Economic stability
25 · Bottom 5%
vs
25 · Bottom 5%

Measured values

Metric3398034446Source period
Population13,12019,1022024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$63,591$58,8022024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,157$35,5462024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,433/sq mi640/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$241,500$256,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,377$1,0062024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate75.7%93.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Bachelor's degree or higher24.8%18.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.4%15.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Average July high93°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low51°F44°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation53.0"51.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport36 mi53 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.0 min27.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age64.160.62024 ACS 5-Year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

Physical risk tradeoff

33980

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, coastal flooding.

34446

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

33980
53
Your Score
Area Score
34446
48
Your Score
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: 33980 — Port Charlotte, FL · 34446 — Sugarmill Woods, FL · How this is calculated: methodology

33980 vs 34446: Location Comparison | AreaProfile