Compare

Farmington vs Eagan

Which is the better fit for you?

Farmington, MN
69
Area Score
Top 22% nationally
Eagan, MN
68
Area Score
Top 26% nationally

Farmington and Eagan receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

Signals

Farmington
Eagan
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 41%
vs
53 · Bottom 43%
Growth
62 · Top 29%
vs
40 · Bottom 31%
Climate
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
55 · Bottom 5%
Physical resilience
88 · Top 14%
vs
88 · Top 14%
Housing affordability
100 · Top 8%
vs
91 · Top 29%
Schools
47 · Bottom 44%
vs
67 · Top 30%
Access
93 · Top 45%
vs
97 · Top 29%
Economic stability
84 · Top 3%
vs
81 · Top 6%

Measured values

MetricFarmingtonEaganSource period
Population23,90268,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$123,673$108,6902024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$48,512$57,1122024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,541/sq mi2,181/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$366,200$397,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,241$1,6792024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate86.5%67.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%4.2%June 2026
Employment change (year over year)-1.9%-1.9%June 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher38.7%54.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.1%5.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2445812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents10.20.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)-22.8%45.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low9°F9°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation31.6"31.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi5 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.2 min23.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.439.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools14162024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.0315.842024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.2%54.7%2019-20 school year
Reading proficiency53.0%58.5%2019-20 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility24.9%27.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

Physical risk tradeoff

Farmington

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail.

Eagan

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Farmington
73
Your Score
69
Area Score
Eagan
71
Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Farmington, MN · Eagan, MN · How this is calculated: methodology

Farmington vs Eagan: Location Comparison | AreaProfile