Compare

Dixon vs Frederickson

Which is the better fit for you?

Dixon, CA
53
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Frederickson, WA
Area Score

Missing required signals: opportunity, growth.

Signals

Dixon
Frederickson
Climate
77 · Top 25%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
24 · Bottom 19%
vs
33 · Bottom 25%
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 26%
vs
66 · Bottom 28%
Access
92 · Top 49%
vs
85 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability
68 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 20%

Measured values

MetricDixonFredericksonSource period
Population19,68325,3832024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$102,878$109,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$41,392$39,3092024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,772/sq mi2,244/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$604,800$477,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,859$2,3862024 ACS 5-Year
Homeownership rate61.3%73.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Bachelor's degree or higher23.8%20.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate10.2%5.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Average July high95°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation24.8"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport21 mi25 miNASR current cycle
Average commute27.7 min38.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.933.42024 ACS 5-Year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

Physical risk tradeoff

Dixon

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake, inland flooding.

Frederickson

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Dixon
60
Your Score
53
Area Score
Frederickson
66
Your Score
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Dixon, CA · Frederickson, WA · How this is calculated: methodology

Dixon vs Frederickson: Location Comparison | AreaProfile