Rancho Cucamonga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.
Signals
Banning
Rancho Cucamonga
Opportunity
34 · Bottom 10%
vs62 · Top 38%
Growth
82 · Top 3%
vs36 · Bottom 26%
Climate
57 · Bottom 8%
vs89 · Top 5%
Physical resilience
4 · Bottom 1%
vs7 · Bottom 2%
Housing affordability
42 · Bottom 5%
vs52 · Bottom 12%
Access
92 · Top 49%
vs100 · Top 1%
Economic stability
33 · Bottom 10%
vs68 · Top 33%
Measured values
| Metric | Banning | Rancho Cucamonga | Source period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,093 | 175,411 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Median household income | $61,764 | $111,895 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Per capita income | $30,856 | $47,475 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Population density | 1,338/sq mi | 3,771/sq mi | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Median home value | $352,100 | $740,200 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Median gross rent | $1,650 | $2,357 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Homeownership rate | 70.2% | 62.3% | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Unemployment rate | 6.5% | 4.3% | June 2026 |
| Employment change (year over year) | -1.4% | -1.4% | June 2026 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher | 16.5% | 37.5% | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Poverty rate | 18.8% | 8.0% | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Housing units permitted (12 months) | 392 | 292 | 12 months ending July 2026 |
| Permits per 1,000 residents | 12.6 | 1.7 | 12 months ending July 2026 |
| Permit change (year over year) | 126.6% | -64.9% | 12 months ending July 2026 |
| Average July high | 109°F | 94°F | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Average January low | 48°F | 45°F | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Annual precipitation | 4.6" | 11.6" | 1991-2020 Normals |
| Distance to major airport | 22 mi | 6 mi | NASR current cycle |
| Average commute | 34.1 min | 34.5 min | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Median age | 42.1 | 38.6 | 2024 ACS 5-Year |
| Public schools | 11 | 36 | 2024-25 school year |
| Students per teacher | 21.81 | 24.28 | 2024-25 school year |
| Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility | 91.1% | 47.5% | 2024-25 school year |
A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.
Physical risk tradeoff
Banning
Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding, earthquake.
Rancho Cucamonga
Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.
Your best match
Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.
Banning
49
Your Score
43
Area Score
Rancho Cucamonga
59
Your Score
52
Area Score
Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.
Full profiles: Banning, CA · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · How this is calculated: methodology